Legal Opinion

Espinosa v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 9, 1991No. 1 CA-IC 90-083PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOKS, Judge.

This is a special action review of a consolidated Arizona Industrial Commission award granting a new injury claim but denying reopening of a prior claim. The issue on review is whether the administrative law judge erroneously denied reopening when the evidence satisfied the legal test for reopening and established that the average monthly wage for the first claim exceeded the average monthly wage for the second claim. We conclude that the successive injury doctrine was correctly applied and therefore affirm the award.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Petitioner employee…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McKay v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Pearce Development v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. O'Donnell v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. Caganich v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lou Grubb Chevrolet v. INDUS. COM'NCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  2. A.J. Goulder Electric v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. Queen Creek Summit, LLC v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. AJ Goulder Elec. v. INDUS. COM'NCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API