Queen Creek Summit, LLC v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARKER, Judge.
¶ 1 Queen Creek Summit, L.L.C. and the other petitioners (collectively, “QCS”) seek special action review of the superior court’s denial of their motion for judgment as a matter of law and grant of the Town of Gilbert’s (“Gilbert”) Application for Immediate Possession. The superior court found that QCS failed to meet its burden of proving that Gilbert had improperly concluded that the public good of locating its pipeline through the middle of Canyon State Academy outweighed the private injury to QCS. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
Facts and Procedural…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Galloway v. VanderpoolArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Phoenix v. HarnishCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Hancock v. BisnarArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Lindsay v. Cave Creek Outfitters, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dabrowski v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019