Legal Opinion
Rovira v. AT & T
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 29, 1991No. 90 Civ. 5486 (RPP)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.
Defendant AT & T moves pursuant to Rules 12(b) and (c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the local law, state law and common law claims in Counts IV, V and VI of the complaint, which allege discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and marital status and breach of contract, on the grounds that those claims are preempted by ERISA and that plaintiffs lack standing to assert them. This Court is asserted to have jurisdiction over the local, state and common law causes of action in that they are pendent to the first…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Selby v. Principal Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Matter of Village Rathskeller, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Minhlong Enterprises, Inc. v. New York International Hostel, Inc. (In Re New York International Hostel, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Rovira v. AT & TDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Catanzano ex rel. Catanzano v. DowlingDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.