Legal Opinion
Selby v. Principal Mutual Life Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 15, 2000No. 98CIV.5283(RLC)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Adrian W. Selby and Jill Selby (“the Selbys”) allege that Principal Life Insurance Company f/k/a Principal Mutual Life Insuranee Company (“Principal”) committed various errors when processing their insurance claims for health benefits, and now move pursuant to Rule 23, F.R. Civ. P., to certify three plaintiff classes challenging Principal’s interpretation of its infertility treatment exclusion, and challenging whether Principal’s claims review and appeal procedures satisfy the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) provisions…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Robidoux v. CelaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Nechis v. Oxford Health Plans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Espinoza v. 953 Associates LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Noble v. 93 University Place Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Daniels v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Hill v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.