Legal Opinion
Glenda Johnson v. SmithKline Beecham Corp
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 7, 2013No. 12-2561, 12-2562, 12-2563, 12-2564, 12-2565PublishedCited by 185 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JORDAN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Glenda Johnson and Steven Lucier appeal an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denying their motion to remand this action to Pennsylvania state court. They contend that the District Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over their claims because the parties do not have complete diversity of citizenship. We conclude that the District Court’s assessment of citizenship was correct, and that none of the Defendants is a citizen of the same state as either Plaintiff. Accordingly, we will affirm.
I.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by185 opinions
- Lincoln Benefit Life Co. v. AEI Life, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Stevens & Ricci IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- In Re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. VI)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- GBForefront LP v. Forefront Management Group LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- A.S. v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.