Legal Opinion

State v. Fraire

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 19, 2021No. 121378PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 121,378 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JULIO ROMERO FRAIRE, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When evaluating a motion for mistrial under K.S.A. 22-3423(1)(c), the trial court decides whether the prejudicial conduct created a fundamental failure in the proceeding. If it did, the district court next decides whether the prejudicial conduct made it impossible to continue the proceeding without denying the parties a fair trial. Under the second step, the court considers whether the conduct caused prejudice that could not be cured or mitigated…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  3. Unruh v. PURINA MILLS, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. State v. LogsdonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. Alfaro-ValledaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  2. State v. DotsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  3. State v. BoswellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  4. State v. GallowaySupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  5. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API