Legal Opinion

State v. Butler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 9, 2026No. 127378Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 127,378 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. DAISHA BUTLER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged in a criminal case, we review the evidence in a light most favorable to the State to determine whether a rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. An appellate court does not reweigh evidence, resolve conflicts in the evidence, or pass on the credibility of witnesses. 2. Under K.S.A. 21-5601(b)(1), the phrase "child under the age of 18 years" designates a protected…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. State v. GunbySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  4. State v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. State v. LogsdonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API