Audemars Piguet Holding S.A. v. Swiss Watch International, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION, ORDER, AND JUDGMENT
LORETTA A. PRESKA, Chief Judge:
Before the Court is Audemars Piguet Holding S.A. (“APSA”) and Audemars Piguet’s (North America) Inc. (“APNA”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) application for additional treble profits and for attorney’s fees and costs, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(b) and Judge Harold Baer, Jr.’s January 6, 2014 Opinion and Order, and Defendants Swiss Watch International Inc. (“SWI”), ILS Holdings, and Lior BenShmuel’s (collectively “Defendants”) Response. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ application is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. BACKGROUND
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- LiButti v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tiffany & Co. v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017