Legal Opinion
Tiffany & Co. v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 14, 2017No. 13CV1041-LTS-DCFPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, United States District Judge
By Opinion and Order dated September 8, 2015 (“Summary Judgment Opinion,” docket entry no. 175), the Court granted summary judgment in favor of Plaintiffs (collectively, “Tiffany”), holding Costco liable for trademark infringement and trademark counterfeiting under the Lan-ham Act with respect to engagement rings sold under certain signage that referenced the mark “Tiffany” as a standalone term. The recitation of undisputed facts and the conclusions' of law set forth in the Summary Judgment Opinion are incorporated…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Rocanova v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Brady v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chrome Hearts LLC v. Controse Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Lexington Furniture Industries, Inc. v. The Lexington Company, ABDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Navarro v. Procter & Gamble CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021