Legal Opinion
Conrick v. Houston Civic Opera Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 9, 1936No. 4664PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Justice.
Appellants sued appellees, a corporation and its several directors, for a debt. Judgment against the corporation was entered as prayed for, but a general demurrer was sustained to the cause of action pleaded against said directors. The action of the trial court in sustaining such demurrer is the only point attempted to be presented on this appeal. Appellants’ briefs fail to state any proposition, or assignment of error submitted as such. A rather rambling assignment of error appears in the briefs. A great number of authorities are cited. These, in most cases, do no more than…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Briggs v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Lyons-Thomas Hardware Co. v. Perry Stove Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
- Connally v. W. H. Lyons & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
- Orr & Lindsley Shoe Co. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Deaderick v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Meyers v. MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- S. H. Kress & Co. v. SelphCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Jerry D. Wheat, Ben D. SudderthCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Portlock v. Perry, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- Nuclear Corporation of America v. HaleDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.