Legal Opinion

Deaderick v. Bank

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1898PublishedCited by 22 opinions

FROM DAYIDSON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Davidson County. H. H. CooK, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

The defendant bank, an ordinary banking corporation, organized in 1887, in Nashville, in this State, having become insolvent, suspended business, and made an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, in March, 1893. The complainants, who were among its depositors at the time of the suspension, filed this bill to hold some of its directors liable for their lost deposits. The Chancellor rendered a decree against the directors for |2fi,725.34, from which two of them, to wit, Yarbrough and Hill, appealed. Upon hearing the cause, the Court of Chancery Appeals reversed this decree, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Briggs v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Graham v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Wallace v. Lincoln Savings BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Farwell v. Great Western Telegraph Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Minton v. StahlmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Merriman v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
  2. Sanford v. Waugh & Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Sweet v. Montpelier Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Union National Bank v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  5. Love v. Nashville Agricultural & Normal InstituteTennessee Supreme Court · 1921

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API