Read v. City of Camden
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of Supreme Court, see 24 Vroom 322.
1Opinion of the Court
*371The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dixon, J.
Bridge avenue, in the city of Camden, was one ’hundred feet wide, running from the Delaware river eastwardly, and through it were laid the tracks of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Second street, sixty-six feet wide, ■ crosses it at about right angles. The plaintiff in error owns land fronting on the west side of Second street, south of Bridge avenue.
On September 26th, 1889, the city council of Camden passed an ordinance with these provisions: That a strip sixty feet wide on the north side of Bridge avenue, extending from Fourth street…
2Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
- Morris & Cummings Dredging Co. v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
- Oregon Transfer Co. v. Tyee Construction Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1960
- United New Jersey Railroad & Canal Co. v. National Docks & New Jersey Junction Connecting Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1895
- Clark v. City of ElizabethSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.