Orefice v. Laurelview Convalescent Center, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
Before this Court is a motion by Defendant Laurelview Convalescent Center, Inc., to quash service of the complaint upon it in the instant action. After due consideration of the arguments of both parties, this Court has concluded that Defendant’s motion múst be denied.
Plaintiff, an architect, instituted this action to recover compensation for services he performed pursuant to an oral contract allegedly entered into between himself and defendant, a New Jersey corporation which operates a convalescent home in Mount Laurel, New Jersey.
In filing his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Allegue v. Gulf & South American S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Nugey v. Paul-Lewis Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Superior Oil Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1978
- Nolan v. Boeing Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1990
- United States ex rel. Combustion Systems Sales, Inc. v. Eastern Metal Products & Fabricators, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1986
- Controlled Metals, Inc. v. Non-Ferrous International Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.