Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 3, 1931No. 31214PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, C. J.

The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment rejecting his demand for annulment of an agreement, dated the 31st of July, 1929, called an act of partition, by which he and the defendants undertook to settle their conflicting claims to 20 acres of land. The land is a part of a tract of 160 acres, for which a patent was issued by the United States government “to Sarepty J. Hill, widow of W. N. Hill,” on the 14th of December, 1895, by virtue of a homestead entry-made by Mrs. Hill’s former husband, W. N. Hill, on the 12th of October, 1872. He died on the 16th of July, 1877, before final proof was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McCune v. EssigSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Succession of GollSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. Succession of WatkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  4. Wadkins v. Producers Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Williams v. HunterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. Drillers, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Audubon Ins. Co. v. FarrSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  3. Misuraca v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  4. Stoufflet v. DuplantisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  5. Brewster v. J.C. Byram Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API