Wadkins v. Producers Oil Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OR THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. ■ The facts, which involve the construction of the Homestead Entry Law of the United States and the rights of an entryman and of his wife, , are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Mb.- Justice McKenna
delivered the opinion of the court.
Action brought in the First Judicial District Court- of Louisiana, in and for the Parish of Caddo, by plaintiff in error (and as he was plaintiff below we shall so call him) against the defendants in error (herein referred to as defendants) for the recognition of Effie Bell Wadkins, represented by him as her natural tutor, as owner of an undivided one-half interest in and to the S. E. 34 of section 3, township 20 North, range 16 West, Caddo Parish, Louisiana, and to put her in possession thereof, and to require the defendants to pay for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shepley v. CowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- McCune v. EssigSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Sturr v. BeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Weyerhaeuser v. HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. DonohueSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Michael Bilyou, Individually & on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Dutchess Beer Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Gauthier v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Doran v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Buchser v. BuchserSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Ford v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.