Legal Opinion
Din v. Long Island Lighting Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 3, 1979No. 78 C 906PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEAHER, District Judge.
Plaintiff initiated this action pro se pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(g). He alleges that the defendant Long Island Lighting Company (“LILCO”) has discriminated against him on the basis of his national origin, which is Pakistanian, in its refusal to hire him as an engineer. Plaintiff is now represented by counsel appearing pro bono to oppose the motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rules 12(b) and 56, F.R. Civ.P., now before the court.
In May 1974, a vacancy occurred in LIL-CO’s Electric Production…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Leo v. General Electric Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Kahn v. Pepsi Cola Bottling GroupDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Williamson v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1980