Legal Opinion

Tuttle & Wakefield v. Exchange Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 4, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Claim. Evidence. Title. Before Judge Miller. Houston superior court. October term, 1891.

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, Justice.

Cheeves was engaged at Fort Valley in the business of buying cotton, not for himself, but for others. He *654had made an arrangement with the Exchange Bank of that place by which the bank was to pay for such cot-toil as he might purchase upon orders received from his customers, upon the express contract that the title to the same should be in the bank until it was reimbursed for the purchase money so advanced. In pursuance of •this contract, the warehouse receipts, which controlled ■the possession, were to be delivered to the bank in every instance before it furnished the money…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Achey v. Coleman & RaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. Central Georgia Land & Lumber Co. v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Carter & Ford v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Johnson v. Redwine Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API