Legal Opinion

Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 2008No. 2006-1155PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} Because the trial court dismissed the complaint in this case on a Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, the allegations of the complaint are presumed to be true. State ex rel. CNG Fin. Corp. v. Nadel, 111 Ohio St.3d 149, 2006-Ohio-5344, 855 N.E.2d 473, ¶ 13.

{¶ 2} Appellee, Jane Doe, had a sexual relationship with Norman Heil, a priest, in 1965. Doe was 16 years old at that time and became pregnant by Father Heil. Doe gave birth on November 7, 1965, and placed the baby for adoption through St. Joseph’s Orphanage.

{¶ 3} In 2004,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ohio State Board of Pharmacy v. FrantzOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Doe v. Archdiocese of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. CNG Financial Corp. v. NadelOhio Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Allen v. Andersen Windows, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  2. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. RyanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. DRFP, LLC v. Republica Bolivariana de VenezuelaDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
  4. State Ex Rel. Shisler v. Ohio Public Employees Retirement SystemOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. DeepRock Disposal Solutions, L.L.C. v. Forté Prods., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API