Legal Opinion

Greene v. . Stadiem

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 12, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Two questions are presented by the appeal:

1. Do the children of the present life tenants take vested remainder interests in the property in question subject only to open up and let in after-born children, if any, of one or both of the present life tenants? Lumber Co. v. Herrington, 183 N. C., 85, 110 S. E., 656.

2. Does the provision “that the said children shall hold said property in common until the youngest of said children shall arrive at the age of 21 years” preclude a division or partition of said lands at the present time, all parties now living having consented, in a. proceeding…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wool v. Fleetwood.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Hill v. RenoIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Latimer v. . WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Dee v. DeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Martin v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barco v. . OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Peyton v. WehrhaneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  3. Langston v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Privett v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Moore v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API