Legal Opinion

Langston v. Wooten

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1950No. 388PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNny, J.

The appellants raise the following questions: (1) Is the language of the will under which the plaintiff, J. C. Langston, Jr., claims title, sufficient to devise to said plaintiff the fee simple title to a portion of testator’s land? (2) If so, does the provision that the devisees shall “have no right to sell it, except to each other” constitute a valid limitation upon the right of alienation ?

The first question, when considered in light of the provisions of G.S. 31-38, in our opinion, must be answered in the affirmative. The statute provides: “When real estate shall be devised to any person,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Taylor v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. Brooks v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Williams v. . McPhersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Barbee v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Henderson v. Western Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Norwood v. . CrowderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Wise v. PostonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Cummings v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1976
  4. Holien v. TrydahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Holien v. TrydahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API