Langston v. Wooten
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNny, J.
The appellants raise the following questions: (1) Is the language of the will under which the plaintiff, J. C. Langston, Jr., claims title, sufficient to devise to said plaintiff the fee simple title to a portion of testator’s land? (2) If so, does the provision that the devisees shall “have no right to sell it, except to each other” constitute a valid limitation upon the right of alienation ?
The first question, when considered in light of the provisions of G.S. 31-38, in our opinion, must be answered in the affirmative. The statute provides: “When real estate shall be devised to any person,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Taylor v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Brooks v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Williams v. . McPhersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Barbee v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Henderson v. Western Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Norwood v. . CrowderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Wise v. PostonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Cummings v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1976
- Holien v. TrydahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Holien v. TrydahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965