Legal Opinion

Moore v. . Baker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBabNIiill, J.

While the petition describes all the land of which the testator died seized and possessed, it does not appear that those now in possession of the tract allotted to Mrs. Moore were made parties to this proceeding. Defendant Sallie Baker Everett is now in possession of the Hyman share. So that in fact this proceeding is prosecuted for the purpose of asserting title as tenants in common to the Martha Norman Baker and the Hyman parcels as described in the partition deed.

Plaintiffs, remaindermen, were not parties to the partition deed executed by the life tenants.' It does not appear that any of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Collier v. . Paper CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Greene v. . StadiemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Interior & West Virginia Railroad v. EplingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Lamkin v. Hines Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  5. Lee v. . MontagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Partin v. DALTON PROPERTY ASSOCIATESCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Barnett v. BarnettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API