State v. Verdon

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellant contends that the district court erred when it determined that it did not have jurisdiction to correct the Minnesota Offense Code entry on appellant’s criminal judgment and warrant of commitment. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellant Robert Verdón was charged with first-degree felony arson in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.561, subd. 1 (2002), felony terroristic threats in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.713, subd. 1 (2002), and felony criminal damage to property in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.595, subd. 1 (2002). The charges arose out of an apartment-fire incident.