Legal Opinion

Barnett v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided May 18, 1989No. 13-88-160-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

Appellant was indicted for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and theft, with a prior felony alleged for enhancement purposes. A jury found him incompetent to stand trial. Approximately eight months later, he was adjudged competent, and the case proceeded to trial. Although appellant pled not guilty by reason of insanity, the jury found appellant guilty of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. The court found the enhancement paragraph was true and sentenced appellant to eight years’ confinement. By three points of error the appellant challenges the selection of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Burdine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kenneth Milo Littlebrave, Jr. v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2012
  2. Kenneth Milo Littlebrave, Jr. v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API