Larson v. Hanson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
- The following opinion was filed April 5, 1932:
Wickhem, J.
The defendant’s appeal is from “that part of that certain order made and entered in this action . . . which orders a new trial and denies defendant’s first motion that the answer to the first question of the special verdict be changed from ‘Yes’ to ‘No,’ and for judgment on the verdict as so changed, and denying defendant’s second motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.”
The portions of the order which deny defendant’s motion to change the answers and for judgment on the verdict as changed, and which further deny defendant’s…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wolfgram v. Town of SchoepkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Treat v. HilesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Lehner v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Sichling v. Nash Motors Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Mills v. ConleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Affett v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- County of Racine v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Pahl v. SpragueNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Featherly v. Continental Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Hawkins v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.