Legal Opinion

Cruickshank & Co. v. Sorros

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 17, 1985No. 1097, Docket 84-9007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKES, Circuit Judge.

This strange admiralty case, on submission to us, involves as real party plaintiff a proprietorship in Rajkat, India, conducting a ship’s agency and stevedoring business in certain Indian ports, including the port of Vadinar. A vessel for which the plaintiff was acting as agent arrived at that port short of diesel bunker oil and hence unable to discharge its petroleum cargo; after four days of mooring with tug assistance, the vessel was towed out to an anchorage at sea by the port operator, an Indian governmental authority, which proceeded to assess the vessel, and when…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meese v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. The PoznanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921
  3. Sidney Blumenthal & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  4. General Electric Co. v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cruickshank & Co., Limited v. SorrosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. Armen Minassian v. Josef EssaviDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023
  3. Vickrey v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API