Legal Opinion
Armen Minassian v. Josef Essavi
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 27, 2023No. 2:23-cv-06603Unknown
1Opinion
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARMEN MINASSIAN, Case No. 2:23-cv-06603-FLA (AJRx) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION TO REMAND AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S EX 14 PARTE APPLICATION TO JOSEF ESSAVI, et al. 15 CONTINUE HEARING DATE Defendants. [DKTS. 11, 14] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 RULING 2 Before the court is Plaintiff Armen Minassian’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand 3 (the “Motion”). Dkt. 11 (“Mot.”). Defendant Josef Essavi (“Defendant”) opposes the 4 Motion. Dkt. 13 (“Opp’n”). Also before the court is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Rafael Arroyo, Jr. v. Carmen RosasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Cruickshank & Co. v. SorrosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985