Legal Opinion

Setton v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1991PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (6) for leave to serve an amended notice of claim nunc pro tunc, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated November 13, 1989, which granted the application.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and as an exercise of discretion, with costs, and the petitioners’ application is denied.

The original notice of claim in this case, involving an allegedly defective sidewalk condition, misidentified the actual location where the claim arose and was, therefore, inadequate to meet the statutory…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Caselli v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Martire v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Krug v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Malla v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Cappadonna v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Yankana v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Eherts v. County of OrangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Rios v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API