Cappadonna v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In a negligence action to *692recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated July 6, 1990, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the notice of claim failed to comply with the requirements of General Municipal Law § 50-e (2).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
General Municipal Law § 50-e (2) provides, in part, that a notice of claim shall set forth "the time when, the place where and the manner in which the claim arose”. We agree with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Caselli v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Martire v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Nicholas v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Krug v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Malla v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Maxwell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Dorce v. United Rentals North America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Eherts v. County of OrangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Ames v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Burgos v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.