Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stewart

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 1999PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, J.:

¶ 1 The Commonwealth appeals from an order granting appellee’s motion to sup*714press physical evidence.1 After a careful review of the relevant case law and the record, we reverse.

¶ 2 The evidence at the suppression hearing revealed the following facts. At approximately 3:00 a.m. on Saturday, June 8, 1996, Javon Jones and Bobby Mahalati were en route to an after-hours club when they encountered appellee, Brett Stewart, and his co-defendant, Shawney Perry, in Center City Philadelphia. Perry was driving a white Lexus, which had stopped at a green light and was blocking a lane of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Pennsylvania v. LabronSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. HolzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GatlosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. SepulvedaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. CopelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. CasanovaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API