Goettman v. North Fork Valley Restaurant
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender
I.Summary
Defendant-Petitioner Hydramatic Engineering, Pty. Ltd., an Australian limited liability company, petitioned for relief pursuant to C.A.R. 21 from the trial court’s order that denied Hydramatic’s motion to dismiss this wrongful death action for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff-Respondent Andrea Goettman argues an agency theory of personal jurisdiction over Hydramatic, alleging that the death of her husband, Michael Goettman, was caused by the negligent and reckless operation of a motor vehicle by Phillip Dunn; that Dunn, up to and at the time of the fatal automobile accident,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Foster-Miller, Inc. v. Babcock & Wilcox CanadaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Archangel Diamond Corp. v. LukoilSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Keefe v. Kirschenbaum & Kirschenbaum, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- D'Jamoos, Estate of Weingeroff v. Pilatus AircraftCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Fowler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Shell v. American Family Rights Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2012
- GOGNAT v. EllsworthColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Giduck v. NiblettColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.