Legal Opinion
Lutz v. Fults
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 13, 1923No. 23,328PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibelu, J.
Action by the vendor for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. There were findings denying specific performance, and granting the defendants judgment for the amount paid on the purchase price. The plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for. a new trial.
On May 21, 1920, the plaintiff as vendor and the defendants as vendees entered into a contract for the sale and purchase of land in Martin county. The defendants paid $2,000 at the time of the execution of the contract. They were to pay $5,000 on March 1, 1921. The balance of the purchase price was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gregory v. ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Johnson v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Brown v. California & Western Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Lynch v. HigginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Schmidt v. Scandinavian Canadian Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
3Cited by4 opinions
- Paynesville Land Co. v. GrabowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- McChesney v. OppekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Seerup v. GoraczkowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Trainer v. LammersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925