Legal Opinion
Seerup v. Goraczkowski
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 23, 1924No. 23,809PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to recover damages for the breach by the defendant of a contract to purchase a farm from the plaintiff. There was a verdict for the plaintiff and the defendant appeals from the order denying his alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
On June 7, 1920, the plaintiff as vendor and the defendant as vendee entered into a contract for the sale and purchase of a quarter section farm for $26,000. The contract was to be closed on March 1, 1921. There was paid $1,000 in cash, $8,600 was to be paid on March 1, 1921, and $16,400 was to be paid by the assumption of *366mortgages of that amount…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Townshend v. GoodfellowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Bigler v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Olson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Gray v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
- Peck v. Brighton Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1873
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Miller v. SnedekerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- West v. WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Trainer v. LammersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Igo Co. v. ParksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Webb v. Consolidated Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939