Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Dep't of Transp.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided March 27, 2018No. F074027PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, P.J.

*950While a public entity may be liable for injuries caused by dangerous conditions of public property ( Gov. Code, §§ 830, 835 ),1 the entity may avoid liability through the affirmative defense of design immunity (§ 830.6). ( Hampton v. County of San Diego (2015) 62 Cal.4th 340, 342, 195 Cal.Rptr.3d 773, 362 P.3d 417.) For design immunity to apply, the public entity " 'must establish three elements: (1) a causal relationship between the plan or design and the accident; (2) discretionary approval of the plan or design prior to construction; and (3) substantial evidence supporting the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Swift Distribution, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Cornette v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Laabs v. City of VictorvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Hampton v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Cameron v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baker v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. Dobbs v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. Stufkosky v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  4. Tansavatdi v. City of Rancho Palos VerdesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Tansavatdi v. City of Rancho Palos VerdesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API