Netherlands Insurance Co. v. United Specialty Insurance Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Sweet, D.J.
Plaintiffs The Netherlands Insurance Company (“Netherlands”) and Arthur Lange, Inc. (“Lange”) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) have moved pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for partial summary judgment declaring that the defendant United Specialty Insurance Company (“United” or the “Defendant”) owes Lange a duty to defend and indemnify in the action Donizete Jose Defreitas v. Penta Painting & Decorating Corp., Arthur Lange, Inc., and Nikman Contracting, Inc. (the “Underlying Action”) and that Netherlands’ policy has an applicable excess “Other…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jose GOENAGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARCH OF DIMES BIRTH DEFECTS FOUNDATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Jaramillo v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Hartford Insurance v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Admiral Insurance Company v. Builders Choice of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. VenturaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Crescent Beach Club LLC v. Indian Harbor Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- Peleus Insurance Company v. Atlantic State Development Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Penn-Star Insurance Company v. Loring Place Realty LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.