Legal Opinion

State v. Michael R. Luedtke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2015No. 2013AP001737-CRPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMichael J. Gableman, J.

¶ 1. This is a review of two published decisions of the court of appeals, State v. Luedtke, 2014 WI App 79, 355 Wis. 2d 436, 851 N.W.2d 837, and State v. Weissinger, 2014 WI App 73, 355 Wis. 2d 546, 851 N.W.2d 780. We consolidated the cases for the purpose of this opinion because both present the same issue on largely similar facts. Both cases require us to examine the constitutional implications of blood sample destruction that deprived the defendants of the opportunity to independently test their samples.

¶ 2. In Luedtke, the Winnebago County District Attorney's Office charged Michael R.…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Kristi Koschkee v. Carolyn Stanford TaylorWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Winnebago County v. Christopher S.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Sonja Blake v. Debra JossartWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. Jeffrey C. DennyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. Alan S. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API