Legal Opinion

Kristi Koschkee v. Carolyn Stanford Taylor

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 2019No. 2017AP002278-OAPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPatience Drake Roggensack, C.J.

*556¶1 This is an original action brought by Kristi Koschkee et al., two licensed teachers and two school board *557members, against Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) Carolyn Stanford Taylor and the Department of Public Instruction (DPI). The petitioners argue that the SPI and DPI must comply with the statutory requirement that, prior to drafting or promulgating an administrative rule, they must receive written approval from the governor.1 The SPI and DPI argue that this requirement of gubernatorial approval is unconstitutional as applied to the SPI because, pursuant to Article X, Section 1…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State ex rel. Wisconsin Inspection Bureau v. WhitmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Wisconsin Citizens Concerned for Cranes & Doves v. Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Marder v. BD. OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF WISC. SYSTEMWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State Ex Rel. Friedrich v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Jere Fabick v. Tony EversWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. Alan S. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Priorities USA v. Wisconsin Elections CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Clean Wisconsin, Inc. v. DNRWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  5. WSBU v. Joel BrennanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API