Legal Opinion
In Re Salazar
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas
Decided March 29, 2006No. 05-95099PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MARVIN ISGUR, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Salazars filed bankruptcy on November 1, 2005 without first obtaining credit counseling. On November 2, 2005, the Salazars filed a motion seeking an extension of time by which they were required to obtain the credit counseling required by 11 U.S.C. § 109(h). The Court denied this request by order on November 16, 2005 and struck the Salazars’ petition. See In re Hubbard, 333 B.R. 377 (Bankr. S.D.Tex.2005). The Salazars filed a motion to reconsider on December 3, 2005. For the reasons set forth below, the motion to reconsider is denied.
Summary
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States Ex Rel. Internal Revenue Service v. McDermottSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Chapman v. Bituminous Insurance (In Re Coho Resources, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- In Re TomcoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Dixon v. LaBarge (In Re Dixon)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Adams v. ZarnelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Padilla v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. (In Re Padilla)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- In Re ParkerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
- In Re ElmendorfUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- In Re CareyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.