Legal Opinion

Young v. Reed

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1939No. 6029PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

Plaintiff, for his own account, and as the assignee of labor claims of fourteen (14) fellow workmen, seeks to recover judgment against the defendants, Dr. C. R. Reed and G. F. Thomas, in solido, for the sum of If 1,414, on the theory that said defendants and one N. W. DeSoto, associated themselves together as partners or joint adventurers for the purpose of exploiting for oil and gas, tracts of land in Sec. 7, T. 16N, Range llW'in Bossier Parish, and for that reason became responsible for the payment of all of the indebtedness incurred in the drilling of. a well on said land…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Daily States Pub. Co. v. UhaltSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  2. Fletcher v. FletcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Ault Wiborg Co. of Canada v. Carson Carbon Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  4. J. E. Tusant & Son Co. v. Chas. Weitz SonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Ludeau v. Avoyelles Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Rae v. CameronMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Gales v. WeldonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. Eva Ruth Bertrand, Individually and as Natural Tutrix of the Minors v. Forest CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. Insul-Wool Insulation Corp. v. Home Insulation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  5. Plaisance v. CollinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API