Legal Opinion
Daily States Pub. Co. v. Uhalt
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 6, 1930No. 30273PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOverton, J.
This is a suit, the purpose of which is to obtain specific performance of a contract by enjoining its breach.
After a hearing had on the rule to show cause why the preliminary injunction should not issue, the .trial judge dissolved the temporary restraining order he had granted, and refused to issue the injunction requested. It is from the order refusing to issue the preliminary injunction that the case is now before us.
The contract, whose breach it is sought to enjoin, is dated June 2, 1928, and reads as follows:
“This agreement this day entered into between Joseph H. Uhalt, of age and a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fletcher v. FletcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Hardin v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- J. E. Tusant & Son Co. v. Chas. Weitz SonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Ludeau v. Avoyelles Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Stewart v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Hayes v. MullerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- McCann v. ToddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- Grand Isle Campsites, Inc. v. CheekSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- HMC MANAGEMENT v. New Orleans Basketball ClubLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- Josephs v. AustinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.