Legal Opinion

Wills v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1930No. Docket No. L.A. 11558PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON, J.—

Plaintiff, her mother and brother, on March 28, 1899, conveyed to the City of Los Angeles for street purposes a strip of land across lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 in block E of Fort Hill tract as per official map, with the object of promoting the construction thereunder of what is known as Broadway tunnel in said city. The validity of the following provisions of said deed furnishes the sole issue upon this appeal: “1. That no right or franchise for a street railroad over said right of way be given by party of the second part, and that the same shall not be used for street railway purposes;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Town of SebastopolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. State ex rel. Townsend v. Board of Park CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. Finch v. Riverside & Arlington RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Housing Authority v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Garcia v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re CollieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Morris v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API