Legal Opinion

Finch v. Riverside & Arlington Railway

California Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1891No. 13657PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hayne, C.

This was an action of ejectment brought by the owner of the fee of one half of a street in the city of Riverside, called Cypress Avenue, against a street-car company, which was alleged to be using such half of the street in an unauthorized and unlawful manner. The trial court gave judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.

There is no dispute about the plaintiff’s ownership of the fee of half of the street, nor about the existence of the street, and the consequent right of the public to use it as a highway. The question litigated is, whether the defendant’s use of it was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. President & Trustees v. San Diego & Los Angeles RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Thomson v. CallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Montgomery v. Santa Ana Westminster Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Jacksonville Ice & Electric Co. v. MosesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Longnecker v. Wichita Railroad & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. State ex rel. Smith v. BowmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API