Legal Opinion

Joseph Carroll v. Paul A. Gross, Sr., Bette Ellen Quial, Patricia A. Seitz

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 25, 1993No. 91-5986PublishedCited by 894 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Appellant Joseph Carroll filed this complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that various members of the Florida State Bar violated his due process rights. Adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation, the district court dismissed Carroll’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). We affirm.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), district courts have discretion to dismiss frivolous in forma pauperis complaints. Denton v. Hernandez, — U.S. -, -, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 1734, 118 L.Ed.2d 340 (1992); Harris v. Menendez, 817 F.2d 737, 741 (11th Cir.1987). At any stage of the proceedings, a case is frivolous for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Dennis v. SparksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Jones v. BalesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by894 opinions

  1. Bilal v. DriverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  2. Jamil A. Al-Amin v. James E. DonaldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Philip Barbara v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. John Bailey v. Morris SilbermanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Derrick Jackson v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

889 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API