State v. Baker
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
Defendant has excepted to the denial of his motion to suppress his pretrial statement, motion for a change of venue or venire, motion for mistrial and motion to strike his testimony, and motions for appropriate relief. However, defendant did not object at trial to the rulings on his motions or to the findings of fact and conclusions of law on which the rulings were based. Defendant also failed to file objections to the findings of fact and conclusions of law which were the basis of the trial court’s denial of his motions for appropriate relief. Exceptions must be properly…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. RookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. JerrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. BiberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.