Legal Opinion

State v. Baker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 2, 1984No. 74A84PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Defendant has excepted to the denial of his motion to suppress his pretrial statement, motion for a change of venue or venire, motion for mistrial and motion to strike his testimony, and motions for appropriate relief. However, defendant did not object at trial to the rulings on his motions or to the findings of fact and conclusions of law on which the rulings were based. Defendant also failed to file objections to the findings of fact and conclusions of law which were the basis of the trial court’s denial of his motions for appropriate relief. Exceptions must be properly…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. RookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. JerrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. BiberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API