Legal Opinion
Shoemaker v. Handel
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 13, 1985No. Civ. A. 85-1770PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROTMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, William Shoemaker, Angel Cordero, Jr., William Herbert McCauley, Philip Grove, and Vincent Bracciole bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking a preliminary injunction against defendants Hal Handel, Samuel A. Boulmetis, Joseph A. Piarulli, Carl H. Hanford, and Richard W. Lawrenson, to restrain the enforcement of New Jersey Racing Commission Regulations N.J.A.C. 13-.70-14A.10 and 13:70-14A.11, which provide for breathalyzer and urine tests for licensed jockeys.
This matter having come before the court on April 24, 1985, and the court, having…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- McDonell v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Capua v. City of PlainfieldDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- In Re Search Warrant (Sealed)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Feliciano v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
- Patchogue-Medford Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education of Patchogue-Medford Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.