Legal Opinion

Lepard v. American River Transportation Co.

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided January 14, 2003No. 3:01-cv-00683Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

STIEHL, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment to which plaintiff has filed a response and defendant a reply. Plaintiff seeks recovery under the Jones Act, and general maritime law of unseaworthiness, for injuries he sustained while employed as a watchman aboard the MTV Co-op Venture on or about February 26, 2001. Plaintiff claims that he injured his lower back as a result of replacing face wires by stringing out new wire to replace kinked face wire on board the vessel.

FACTUAL SUMMARY

The parties agree that the following…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Spinks v. Chevron Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API