Legal Opinion
BECKFORD
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2000No. ID 3425PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3425 In re Gary Fitzroy BECKFORD, Respondent File A31 288 979 - Hartford Decided January 19, 2000 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Where an alien has filed an untimely motion to reopen alleging that the Immigration and Naturalization Service failed to prove the alien’s removability, the burden of proof no longer lies with the Service to establish removability, but shifts to the alien to demonstrate that an exceptional situation exists that warrants reopening by the Board of Immigration Appeals on its own…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- M-A-MBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2011
- Jezierski v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Kap Sun Bukta v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Rumierz v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Ivan Vetcher v. William Barr, U. S. Atty GenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.