Drainage Dist. No. 4 v. Crow
Oregon Supreme Court
Washington county: Frank J. Taylor, Judge. Plaintiff appeals. This is an action commenced before a justice of the peace of Washington county to recover a tax of §10.30. The grounds upon which plaintiff seeks a recovery are stated in its complaint, substantially as follows: That plaintiff has been and is now a drainage district, duly organized and existing under the laws of Oregon providing for the drainage of lands in Washington county, Oregon, said drainage district being…
Read the full summary
Washington county: Frank J. Taylor, Judge. Plaintiff appeals. This is an action commenced before a justice of the peace of Washington county to recover a tax of §10.30. The grounds upon which plaintiff seeks a recovery are stated in its complaint, substantially as follows: That plaintiff has been and is now a drainage district, duly organized and existing under the laws of Oregon providing for the drainage of lands in Washington county, Oregon, said drainage district being organized for the purpose of clearing Dairy creek and Lousignot lake, in said county and state, of driftwood and other…
1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, C. J.
— There is no bill of exceptions in this case, and therefore the main questions argued upon the trial we are not permitted to examine because the same are not presented by the record. The only question that is presented by the judgment roll is the sufficiency of the findings of fact to support the judgment. The findings of fact are as follows: “The court now finds that the allegations of the complaint are not sustained; that said drainage district is not legally organized; that said alleged tax has not been legally levied, and as conclusions of law the court finds that the defendant is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fink v. Canyon Road Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1874
- Paulson v. NunanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Dowd v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- North Pacific Railroad v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- McFadden v. FriendlyOregon Supreme Court · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Maeder Steel Products Co. v. ZanelloOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Moody v. RichardsOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Dillon Implement Co. v. CleavelandUtah Supreme Court · 1906
- Pengra v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Turner v. CyrusOregon Supreme Court · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.