Legal Opinion

Rice v. Wheeling Dollar Savings & Trust Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1951No. 32242PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

As this court views the matter, there are two controlling questions involved in this appeal. The first and probably more important is: Do the claims asserted by plaintiffs in their petition arise upon contract within the meaning and intent of Section 11819, General Code, so as to support the attachments? The second is: Where property has been attached as an incident of a civil action for the recovery of money, should a court entertain favorably motions to discharge the attachment on the ground that the moving parties are not the owners of the property attached?

These questions will be answered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hummel v. HummelOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  2. McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Bill v. GattavaraWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Western Assurance Co. v. TowleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Lipscomb v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Aultman Hospital Ass'n v. Community Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Tom Everett v. Verizon Wireless, Inc., Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. Legros v. TarrOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Paugh & Farmer, Inc. v. Menorah Home for Jewish AgedOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. United National Insurance Company v. Sst Fitness CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API