Legal Opinion
Holbrook v. LINK-BELT CONST. EQUIPMENT
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 9, 2000No. 24953-7-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
12 P.3d 638 (2000)
103 Wash.App. 279
HOLBROOK, INC., a Washington corporation, Appellant,
v.
LINK-BELT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Isuzu Diesel of North American, Inc. and Howard Cooper Corporation, Respondents.
No. 24953-7-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
November 9, 2000.
Peter Thomas Petrich, Davies Pearson Pc, Tacoma, for Appellant.
Jerret E. Sale, Elizabeth Curie Kim, Bullivant Houser Bailey, P.c., John Alan Knox, Margaret A. Sundberg, Williams Kastner & Gibbs, Seattle, for Respondents.
HUNT, J.
Holbrook, Inc. (Holbrook) appeals the summary judgment dismissal of its product…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Triangle Underwriters, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc. And Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Del Guzzi Constr. Co. v. Global Northwest Ltd., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Daughtry v. Jet Aeration Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- Binkley Company v. Teledyne Mid-America CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1971
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kittitas Reclamation District v. Spider Staging Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Kittitas Reclamation v. Spider StagingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Fairchild v. Kubota Tractor CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020