Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Britton

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 2001No. G025710PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOORE, J.

Following the denial of his motion to suppress evidence under Penal Code section 1538.5, Harold Lee Britton pleaded guilty to a charge under Health and Safety Code section 11350, subdivision (a), for possession of heroin. He asserts the magistrate erred by permitting the prosecution to respond orally to his motion rather than requiring it to file and serve a timely written response, thereby violating his rights to due process and a fair trial. In addition, defendant maintains the trial court erroneously concluded the arresting police officer articulated adequate facts to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. People v. SouzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. AyalaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. People v. PERRUSQUIACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. BARSAMIAN v. City of KingsburgDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
  4. People v. Justin K.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. People v. Flores, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API